UserUmaskOption: Implement validate_value instead of set_value
set_value() is implemented by the base class, subclasses only need to override validate_value().
This commit is contained in:
parent
75cce9e157
commit
531722229b
|
@ -109,11 +109,10 @@ class UserUmaskOption(UserIntegerOption):
|
|||
def __init__(self, name, description, value, yielding=None):
|
||||
super().__init__(name, description, 0, 0o777, value, yielding)
|
||||
|
||||
def set_value(self, newvalue):
|
||||
if newvalue is None or newvalue == 'preserve':
|
||||
self.value = None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
super().set_value(newvalue)
|
||||
def validate_value(self, value):
|
||||
if value is None or value == 'preserve':
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return super().validate_value(value)
|
||||
|
||||
def toint(self, valuestring):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue