Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphael Isemann
423c2e98e4 [lldb] Fix crash in CxxModuleHandler when std module is empty
We currently don't handle the error in the Expected we get
when searching for an equal local DeclContext. Usually this can't
happen as this would require that we have a STL container and
we can find libc++'s std module, but when we load the module in
the expression parser the module doesn't even contain the 'std'
namespace. The only way I see to test this is by having a fake
'std' module that requires a special define to actually provide
its contents, while it will just be empty (that is, it doesn't
even contain the 'std' namespace) without that define. LLDB currently
doesn't know about that define in the expression parser, so it
will load the wrong 'empty' module which should trigger this error.

Also removed the 'auto' for that variable as the function name
doesn't make it obvious that this is an expected and not just
a optional/ptr (which is how this slipped in from the start).

llvm-svn: 374525
2019-10-11 08:42:22 +00:00
Gabor Marton
5ac6d49065 [ASTImporter] Use llvm::Expected and Error in the importer API
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
  and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.

Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin

Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits

Tags: #clang, #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438

llvm-svn: 360760
2019-05-15 10:29:48 +00:00
Raphael Isemann
9a0acdf65e Add std::stack and std::queue support to CxxModuleHandler
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik

Reviewed By: aprantl, shafik

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61305

llvm-svn: 359779
2019-05-02 11:25:50 +00:00
Raphael Isemann
9a7ccd01b6 Sort containers alphabetically in CxxModuleHandler [NFC]
llvm-svn: 359546
2019-04-30 10:27:31 +00:00
Raphael Isemann
f74a4c1f6d Instantiate 'std' templates explicitly in the expression evaluator
Summary:
This patch is a follow-up for D58125. It implements the manual instantiation and merging of 'std' templates like
`std::vector` and `std::shared_ptr` with information from the debug info AST. This (finally) allows using these classes
in the expression evaluator like every other class (i.e. things like `vec.size()` and shared_ptr debugging now works, yay!).

The main logic is the `CxxModuleHandler` which intercept the ASTImporter import process and replaces any `std` decls
by decls from the C++ module. The decls from the C++ module are "imported" by just deserializing them directly in
the expression evaluation context. This is mostly because we don't want to rely on the ASTImporter to correctly import
these declarations, but in the future we should also move to the ASTImporter for that.

This patch doesn't contain the automatic desugaring for result variables. This means that if you call for example
`size` of `std::vector` you maybe get some very verbose typedef'd type as the variable type, e.g.
`std::vector<int, std::allocator<int>>::value_type`.

This is not only unreadable, it also means that our ASTImporter has to import all these types and associated
decls into the persisent variable context. This currently usually leads to some assertion getting triggered
in Clang when the ASTImporter either makes a mistake during importing or our debug info AST is inconsitent.
The current workaround I use in the tests is to just cast the result to it's actual type (e.g. `size_t` or `int`) to prevent
the ASTImporter from having to handle all these complicated decls.

The automatic desugaring will be a future patch because I'm not happy yet with the current code for that and because
I anticipate that this will be a controversial patch.

Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, jingham, martong, serge-sans-paille

Reviewed By: martong

Subscribers: balazske, rnkovacs, mgorny, mgrang, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits

Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59537

llvm-svn: 359538
2019-04-30 08:41:35 +00:00