RelocationBaseSection is not used in -r links, so Config->Relocatable will
always be false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58489
llvm-svn: 354607
Three MIPS-specific sections `.reginfo`, `.MIPS.options`, and `.MIPS.abiflags`
are used by loader to read their contents and setup environment for running
a program. Loader looks up these data in the corresponding segments:
`PT_MIPS_REGINFO`, `PT_MIPS_OPTIONS`, and `PT_MIPS_ABIFLAGS` respectively.
This patch put these sections to separate segments like we do already
for ARM `SHT_ARM_EXIDX` section.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D58381
llvm-svn: 354468
MIPS R6 code uses the `R_MIPS_PC26_S2` relocation for calls which might
cross boundaries of non-PIC-to-PIC code. We need to create a LA25 thunks
for that case.
llvm-svn: 354312
The patch solves two tasks:
1. MIPS ABI allows to mix regular and microMIPS code and perform
cross-mode jumps. Linker needs to detect such cases and replace
jump/branch instructions by their cross-mode equivalents.
2. Other tools like dunamic linkers need to recognize cases when dynamic
table entries, e_entry field of an ELF header etc point to microMIPS
symbol. Linker should provide such information.
The first task is implemented in the `MIPS<ELFT>::relocateOne()` method.
New routine `fixupCrossModeJump` detects ISA mode change, checks and
replaces an instruction.
The main problem is how to recognize that relocation target is microMIPS
symbol. For absolute and section symbols compiler or assembler set the
less-significant bit of the symbol's value or sum of the symbol's value
and addend. And this bit signals to linker about microMIPS code. For
global symbols compiler cannot do the same trick because other tools like,
for example, disassembler wants to know an actual position of the symbol.
So compiler sets STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS flag in the `st_other` field.
In `MIPS<ELFT>::relocateOne()` method we have a symbol's value only and
cannot access any symbol's attributes. To pass type of the symbol
(regular/microMIPS) to that routine as well as other places where we
write a symbol value as-is (.dynamic section, `Elf_Ehdr::e_entry` field
etc) we set when necessary a less-significant bit in the `getSymVA`
function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40147
llvm-svn: 354311
On PowerPC64, it is necessary to keep the LocalEntry bits in st_other,
especially when -r is used. Otherwise, when the resulting object is used
in a posterior linking, LocalEntry info will be unavailable and
functions may be called through the wrong entrypoint.
Patch by Leandro Lupori.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56782
llvm-svn: 354184
Summary:
So this patch just make sure that the thread is at least stated
before we return from main.
If we just detach then the thread may be actually be stated just after
the process returned from main and it's calling atexit handers. Then the thread may try to create own function static variable and it will
add new at exit handlers confusing libc.
GLIBC before 2.27 had race in that case which corrupted atexit handlers
list. Support for this use-case for other implementation is also unclear,
so we can try just avoid that.
PR40162
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58246
llvm-svn: 354078
Previously, we showed the following message for an unknown relocation:
foo.o: unrecognized reloc 256
This patch improves it so that the error message includes a symbol name:
foo.o: unknown relocation (256) against symbol bar
llvm-svn: 354040
Non-GOT non-PLT relocations to non-preemptible ifuncs result in the
creation of a canonical PLT, which now takes the identity of the IFUNC
in the symbol table. This (a) ensures address consistency inside and
outside the module, and (b) fixes a bug where some of these relocations
end up pointing to the resolver.
Fixes (at least) PR40474 and PR40501.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57371
llvm-svn: 353981
This fixes a 7.0 -> 8.0 regression when parsing
OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf32-powerpc"); or elf32-bigmips directive in ldscripts
as well as an unknown emulation error when lld is invoked by clang due
to missed elf32ppclinux case.
Patch by vit9696
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58005
llvm-svn: 353968
Previously, we validated -z options after we process --version or --help flags.
So, if one of these flags is given, we wouldn't show an "unknown -z option"
error. This patch fixes that behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55446
llvm-svn: 353967
A follow up to the intial patch that unblocked linking against libgcc.
For lld we don't need to bother tracking which objects have got based small
code model relocations. This is due to the fact that the compilers on
powerpc64 use the .toc section to generate indirections to symbols (rather then
using got relocations) which keeps the got small. This makes overflowing a
small code model got relocation very unlikely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57245
llvm-svn: 353849
gold accepts quoted strings. binutils requires quoted strings for some
kinds of symbols, e.g.:
it accepts quoted symbols with @ in name:
$ echo 'EXTERN("__libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.2.5")' > a.script
$ g++ a.script
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/crt1.o: In function `_start':
(.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
but rejects them if unquoted:
$ echo 'EXTERN(__libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.2.5)' > a.script
$ g++ a.script
a.script: file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
To maintain compatibility with existing linker scripts support quoted
strings in lld as well.
Patch by Lucian Adrian Grijincu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57987
llvm-svn: 353756
R_X86_64_PC{8,16} relocations are sign-extended, so when we check
for relocation overflow, we had to use checkInt instead of checkUInt.
I confirmed that GNU linkers create the same output for the test case.
llvm-svn: 353437
This is the same as D57749, but for x64 target.
"ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage" p41 says (https://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf):
R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF relocation is used for IE TLS models.
Hence if linker sees this relocation we should add DF_STATIC_TLS flag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57821
llvm-svn: 353378
With the following changes:
1) Compilation fix:
std::atomic<bool> HasStaticTlsModel = false; ->
std::atomic<bool> HasStaticTlsModel{false};
2) Adjusted the comment in code.
Initial commit message:
DF_STATIC_TLS flag indicates that the shared object or executable
contains code using a static thread-local storage scheme.
Patch checks if IE/LE relocations were used to check if the code uses
a static model. If so it sets the DF_STATIC_TLS flag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57749
----
Modified : /lld/trunk/ELF/Arch/X86.cpp
Modified : /lld/trunk/ELF/Config.h
Modified : /lld/trunk/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp
Added : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/Inputs/i386-static-tls-model1.s
Added : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/Inputs/i386-static-tls-model2.s
Added : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/Inputs/i386-static-tls-model3.s
Added : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/Inputs/i386-static-tls-model4.s
Added : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/i386-static-tls-model.s
Modified : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/i386-tls-ie-shared.s
Modified : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-dynamic-i686.s
Modified : /lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-opt-iele-i686-nopic.s
llvm-svn: 353299
DF_STATIC_TLS flag indicates that the shared object or executable
contains code using a static thread-local storage scheme.
Patch checks if IE/LE relocations were used to check if the code uses
a static model. If so it sets the DF_STATIC_TLS flag.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57749
llvm-svn: 353293
Summary:
R_PPC64_TLSGD and R_PPC64_TLSLD are used as markers on TLS code sequences. After GD-to-IE or GD-to-LE relaxation, the next relocation R_PPC64_REL24 should be skipped to not create a false dependency on __tls_get_addr. When linking statically, the false dependency may cause an "undefined symbol: __tls_get_addr" error.
R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA
R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_LO
R_PPC64_TLSGD R_TLSDESC_CALL
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
Reviewers: ruiu, sfertile, syzaara, espindola
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits, tamur
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57673
llvm-svn: 353262
Summary:
This follows the ld.bfd/gold behavior.
The error check is useful as it captures a common type of ld.so undefined symbol errors as link-time errors:
// a.cc => a.so (not linked with -z defs)
void f(); // f is undefined
void g() { f(); }
// b.cc => executable with a DT_NEEDED entry on a.so
void g();
int main() { g(); }
// ld.so errors when g() is executed (lazy binding) or when the program is started (-z now)
// symbol lookup error: ... undefined symbol: f
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: llvm-commits, emaste, arichardson
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57569
llvm-svn: 352943
Summary:
In ld.bfd/gold, --no-allow-shlib-undefined is the default when linking
an executable. This patch implements a check to error on undefined
symbols in a shared object, if all of its DT_NEEDED entries are seen.
Our approach resembles the one used in gold, achieves a good balance to
be useful but not too smart (ld.bfd traces all DSOs and emulates the
behavior of a dynamic linker to catch more cases).
The error is issued based on the symbol table, different from undefined
reference errors issued for relocations. It is most effective when there
are DSOs that were not linked with -z defs (e.g. when static sanitizers
runtime is used).
gold has a comment that some system libraries on GNU/Linux may have
spurious undefined references and thus system libraries should be
excluded (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6811). The
story may have changed now but we make --allow-shlib-undefined the
default for now. Its interaction with -shared can be discussed in the
future.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: joerg, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57385
llvm-svn: 352826
Previously we were never setting this which means it was always being
set to Default (-O2/-Os).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57422
llvm-svn: 352667
Summary:
After rLLD344952 ("Add OUTPUT_FORMAT linker script directive support"),
using BFD names such as `elf64-x86-64-freebsd` the `OUTPUT_FORMAT`
linker script command does not work anymore, resulting in errors like:
```
ld: error: /home/dim/src/clang800-import/stand/efi/loader/arch/amd64/ldscript.amd64:2: unknown output format name: elf64-x86-64-freebsd
>>> OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64-freebsd", "elf64-x86-64-freebsd", "elf64-x86-64-freebsd")
>>> ^
```
To fix this, recognize a `-freebsd` suffix in BFD names, and also set
`Configuration::OSABI` to `ELFOSABI_FREEBSD` for those cases.
Add and/or update several test cases to check for the correct results of
these new `OUTPUT_FORMAT` arguments.
Reviewers: ruiu, atanasyan, grimar, hokein, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57283
llvm-svn: 352606
Previously we were setting it to the GotPlt output section, which is
incorrect on ARM where this section is in .got. In static binaries
this can lead to sh_info being set to -1 (because there is no .got.plt)
which results in various tools rejecting the output file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57274
llvm-svn: 352413
Summary:
lld discards .gnu.linonce.* sections work around a bug in glibc.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20543
Unfortunately, the Linux kernel uses a section named
.gnu.linkonce.this_module to store infomation about kernel modules. The
kernel reads data from this section when loading kernel modules, and
errors if it fails to find this section. The current behavior of lld
discards this section when kernel modules are linked, so kernel modules
linked with lld are unloadable by the linux kernel.
The Linux kernel should use a comdat section instead of .gnu.linkonce.
The minimum version of binutils supported by the kernel supports comdat
sections. The kernel is also not relying on the old linkonce behavior;
it seems to have chosen a name that contains a deprecated GNU feature.
Changing the section name now in the kernel would require all kernel
modules to be recompiled to make use of the new section name. Instead,
rather than discarding .gnu.linkonce.*, let's discard the more specific
section name to continue working around the glibc issue while supporting
linking Linux kernel modules.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/329
Reviewers: pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: nathanchance, emaste, arichardson, void, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57294
llvm-svn: 352302
Guessing that the slashes used in the scripts SECTION command was causing the
windows related failures in the added test.
Original commit message:
Small code model global variable access on PPC64 has a very limited range of
addressing. The instructions the relocations are used on add an offset in the
range [-0x8000, 0x7FFC] to the toc pointer which points to .got +0x8000, giving
an addressable range of [.got, .got + 0xFFFC]. While user code can be recompiled
with medium and large code models when the binary grows too large for small code
model, there are small code model relocations in the crt files and libgcc.a
which are typically shipped with the distros, and the ABI dictates that linkers
must allow linking of relocatable object files using different code models.
To minimze the chance of relocation overflow, any file that contains a small
code model relocation should have its .toc section placed closer to the .got
then any .toc from a file without small code model relocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56920
llvm-svn: 352071
This does *not* implement full SHT_GROUP semantic, yet it is a simple step forward:
Sections within a group are still considered valid, but they do not behave as
specified by the standard in case of garbage collection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56437
llvm-svn: 352068
