Files
llvm/lldb/source/Expression/Expression.cpp
Raphael Isemann 52f3a2faf9 [lldb][NFC] Move LLVM RTTI implementation from enum to static ID variable
Summary:
swift-lldb currently has to patch the ExpressionKind enum to add support for Swift expressions. If we implement LLVM's RTTI
with a static ID variable instead of a centralised enum we can drop that patch.

Reviewers: labath, davide

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Tags: #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches, #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70070
2019-11-12 10:04:32 +01:00

29 lines
1015 B
C++

//===-- Expression.cpp ------------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "lldb/Expression/Expression.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ExecutionContextScope.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
using namespace lldb_private;
Expression::Expression(Target &target)
: m_target_wp(target.shared_from_this()),
m_jit_start_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS),
m_jit_end_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
// Can't make any kind of expression without a target.
assert(m_target_wp.lock());
}
Expression::Expression(ExecutionContextScope &exe_scope)
: m_target_wp(exe_scope.CalculateTarget()),
m_jit_start_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS),
m_jit_end_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
assert(m_target_wp.lock());
}