Files
llvm/clang/test/CodeGen/inline-asm-mixed-style.c
Nick Desaulniers 246398ece7 [clang][Parse] properly parse asm-qualifiers, asm inline
Summary:
The parsing of GNU C extended asm statements was a little brittle and
had a few issues:
- It was using Parse::ParseTypeQualifierListOpt to parse the `volatile`
  qualifier.  That parser is really meant for TypeQualifiers; an asm
  statement doesn't really have a type qualifier. This is still maybe
  nice to have, but not necessary. We now can check for the `volatile`
  token by properly expanding the grammer, rather than abusing
  Parse::ParseTypeQualifierListOpt.
- The parsing of `goto` was position dependent, so `asm goto volatile`
  wouldn't parse. The qualifiers should be position independent to one
  another. Now they are.
- We would warn on duplicate `volatile`, but the parse error for
  duplicate `goto` was a generic parse error and wasn't clear.
- We need to add support for the recent GNU C extension `asm inline`.
  Adding support to the parser with the above issues highlighted the
  need for this refactoring.

Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html

Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: aheejin, jfb, nathanchance, cfe-commits, echristo, efriedma, rsmith, chandlerc, craig.topper, erichkeane, jyu2, void, srhines

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75563
2020-03-12 15:13:59 -07:00

25 lines
631 B
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-unknown-unknown -fasm-blocks -O0 -emit-llvm -S %s -o - | FileCheck %s
// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
void f() {
__asm mov eax, ebx
__asm mov ebx, ecx
__asm__("movl %ecx, %edx");
// CHECK: movl %ebx, %eax
// CHECK: movl %ecx, %ebx
// CHECK: movl %ecx, %edx
__asm mov eax, ebx
__asm volatile ("movl %ecx, %edx");
// CHECK: movl %ebx, %eax
// CHECK: movl %ecx, %edx
__asm volatile goto ("movl %ecx, %edx");
// CHECK: movl %ecx, %edx
__asm mov eax, ebx
__asm goto ("movl %ecx, %edx");
// CHECK: movl %ebx, %eax
// CHECK: movl %ecx, %edx
}