Files
llvm/clang/lib/CodeGen
Eric Fiselier fa752f23cc [Builtins] Overload __builtin_operator_new/delete to allow forwarding to usual allocation/deallocation functions.
Summary:
Libc++'s default allocator uses `__builtin_operator_new` and `__builtin_operator_delete` in order to allow the calls to new/delete to be ellided. However, libc++ now needs to support over-aligned types in the default allocator. In order to support this without disabling the existing optimization Clang needs to support calling the aligned new overloads from the builtins.

See llvm.org/PR22634 for more information about the libc++ bug.

This patch changes `__builtin_operator_new`/`__builtin_operator_delete` to call any usual `operator new`/`operator delete` function. It does this by performing overload resolution with the arguments passed to the builtin to determine which allocation function to call. If the selected function is not a usual allocation function a diagnostic is issued.

One open issue is if the `align_val_t` overloads should be considered "usual" when `LangOpts::AlignedAllocation` is disabled.


In order to allow libc++ to detect this new behavior the value for `__has_builtin(__builtin_operator_new)` has been updated to `201802`.

Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington, bogner, ahatanak

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43047

llvm-svn: 328134
2018-03-21 19:19:48 +00:00
..
2018-03-20 22:02:57 +00:00
2018-03-01 05:43:23 +00:00
2018-03-01 05:43:23 +00:00
2018-03-20 22:02:57 +00:00
2018-03-20 22:02:57 +00:00
2018-03-01 05:43:23 +00:00
2018-03-20 22:02:57 +00:00

IRgen optimization opportunities.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

The common pattern of
--
short x; // or char, etc
(x == 10)
--
generates an zext/sext of x which can easily be avoided.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

Bitfields accesses can be shifted to simplify masking and sign
extension. For example, if the bitfield width is 8 and it is
appropriately aligned then is is a lot shorter to just load the char
directly.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

It may be worth avoiding creation of alloca's for formal arguments
for the common situation where the argument is never written to or has
its address taken. The idea would be to begin generating code by using
the argument directly and if its address is taken or it is stored to
then generate the alloca and patch up the existing code.

In theory, the same optimization could be a win for block local
variables as long as the declaration dominates all statements in the
block.

NOTE: The main case we care about this for is for -O0 -g compile time
performance, and in that scenario we will need to emit the alloca
anyway currently to emit proper debug info. So this is blocked by
being able to emit debug information which refers to an LLVM
temporary, not an alloca.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

We should try and avoid generating basic blocks which only contain
jumps. At -O0, this penalizes us all the way from IRgen (malloc &
instruction overhead), all the way down through code generation and
assembly time.

On 176.gcc:expr.ll, it looks like over 12% of basic blocks are just
direct branches!

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//