Improve our semantic error recovery.

When an error made a record member invalid, the record would stay as "isBeingDefined" and
not "completeDefinition". Even easily recoverable errors ended up propagating records in
such "beingDefined" state, for example:

struct A {
  ~A() const; // expected-error {{'const' qualifier is not allowed on a destructor}}
};
struct B : A {}; // A & B would stay as "not complete definition" and "being defined".

This weird state was impending lookups in the records and hitting assertion in the ASTWriter.

Part of rdar://11007039

llvm-svn: 152432
This commit is contained in:
Argyrios Kyrtzidis
2012-03-09 20:10:30 +00:00
parent d5744b9910
commit 2559629c5b
4 changed files with 47 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -2378,8 +2378,11 @@ Decl *Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier AS,
Tag = CTD->getTemplatedDecl();
}
if (Tag)
if (Tag) {
Tag->setFreeStanding();
if (Tag->isInvalidDecl())
return Tag;
}
if (unsigned TypeQuals = DS.getTypeQualifiers()) {
// Enforce C99 6.7.3p2: "Types other than pointer types derived from object
@@ -8601,6 +8604,13 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagFinishDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD,
TagDecl *Tag = cast<TagDecl>(TagD);
Tag->setRBraceLoc(RBraceLoc);
// Make sure we "complete" the definition even it is invalid.
if (Tag->isBeingDefined()) {
assert(Tag->isInvalidDecl() && "We should already have completed it");
if (RecordDecl *RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(Tag))
RD->completeDefinition();
}
if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(Tag))
FieldCollector->FinishClass();
@@ -8632,6 +8642,12 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagDefinitionError(Scope *S, Decl *TagD) {
TagDecl *Tag = cast<TagDecl>(TagD);
Tag->setInvalidDecl();
// Make sure we "complete" the definition even it is invalid.
if (Tag->isBeingDefined()) {
if (RecordDecl *RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(Tag))
RD->completeDefinition();
}
// We're undoing ActOnTagStartDefinition here, not
// ActOnStartCXXMemberDeclarations, so we don't have to mess with
// the FieldCollector.
@@ -8840,11 +8856,19 @@ FieldDecl *Sema::CheckFieldDecl(DeclarationName Name, QualType T,
}
QualType EltTy = Context.getBaseElementType(T);
if (!EltTy->isDependentType() &&
RequireCompleteType(Loc, EltTy, diag::err_field_incomplete)) {
// Fields of incomplete type force their record to be invalid.
Record->setInvalidDecl();
InvalidDecl = true;
if (!EltTy->isDependentType()) {
if (RequireCompleteType(Loc, EltTy, diag::err_field_incomplete)) {
// Fields of incomplete type force their record to be invalid.
Record->setInvalidDecl();
InvalidDecl = true;
} else {
NamedDecl *Def;
EltTy->isIncompleteType(&Def);
if (Def && Def->isInvalidDecl()) {
Record->setInvalidDecl();
InvalidDecl = true;
}
}
}
// C99 6.7.2.1p8: A member of a structure or union may have any type other

View File

@@ -527,10 +527,6 @@ static bool LookupBuiltin(Sema &S, LookupResult &R) {
/// the class at this point.
static bool CanDeclareSpecialMemberFunction(ASTContext &Context,
const CXXRecordDecl *Class) {
// Don't do it if the class is invalid.
if (Class->isInvalidDecl())
return false;
// We need to have a definition for the class.
if (!Class->getDefinition() || Class->isDependentContext())
return false;

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,18 @@
void erroneous(int);
void erroneous(float);
struct bar;
struct zed {
bar g;
};
struct baz {
zed h;
};
struct S {
{
;
#else
void foo(void) {
@@ -17,8 +29,8 @@ void foo(void) {
// RUN: c-index-test -test-load-source local %s -include %t.h -Xclang -detailed-preprocessing-record | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PARSE %s
// RUN: c-index-test -index-file %s -include %t.h -Xclang -detailed-preprocessing-record | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-INDEX %s
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:10:6: FunctionDecl=foo:10:6 (Definition) Extent=[10:1 - 12:2]
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:11:3: CallExpr=erroneous:5:6 Extent=[11:3 - 11:15]
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:{{.*}}:6: FunctionDecl=foo
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:{{.*}}:3: CallExpr=erroneous
// CHECK-INDEX: [indexDeclaration]: kind: function | name: foo
// CHECK-INDEX: [indexEntityReference]: kind: function | name: erroneous

View File

@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ struct basic_string{
basic_string(aT*);
};
struct runtime_error{ // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
runtime_error( // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
struct runtime_error{
runtime_error(
basic_string<char> struct{ // expected-error {{cannot combine with previous 'type-name' declaration specifier}}
a(){ // expected-error {{requires a type specifier}}
runtime_error(0); // expected-error {{no matching conversion}}
runtime_error(0);
}
}
);