mirror of
https://github.com/intel/llvm.git
synced 2026-02-02 18:18:09 +08:00
Improve our semantic error recovery.
When an error made a record member invalid, the record would stay as "isBeingDefined" and
not "completeDefinition". Even easily recoverable errors ended up propagating records in
such "beingDefined" state, for example:
struct A {
~A() const; // expected-error {{'const' qualifier is not allowed on a destructor}}
};
struct B : A {}; // A & B would stay as "not complete definition" and "being defined".
This weird state was impending lookups in the records and hitting assertion in the ASTWriter.
Part of rdar://11007039
llvm-svn: 152432
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2378,8 +2378,11 @@ Decl *Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier AS,
|
||||
Tag = CTD->getTemplatedDecl();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (Tag)
|
||||
if (Tag) {
|
||||
Tag->setFreeStanding();
|
||||
if (Tag->isInvalidDecl())
|
||||
return Tag;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (unsigned TypeQuals = DS.getTypeQualifiers()) {
|
||||
// Enforce C99 6.7.3p2: "Types other than pointer types derived from object
|
||||
@@ -8601,6 +8604,13 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagFinishDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD,
|
||||
TagDecl *Tag = cast<TagDecl>(TagD);
|
||||
Tag->setRBraceLoc(RBraceLoc);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure we "complete" the definition even it is invalid.
|
||||
if (Tag->isBeingDefined()) {
|
||||
assert(Tag->isInvalidDecl() && "We should already have completed it");
|
||||
if (RecordDecl *RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(Tag))
|
||||
RD->completeDefinition();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(Tag))
|
||||
FieldCollector->FinishClass();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8632,6 +8642,12 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagDefinitionError(Scope *S, Decl *TagD) {
|
||||
TagDecl *Tag = cast<TagDecl>(TagD);
|
||||
Tag->setInvalidDecl();
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure we "complete" the definition even it is invalid.
|
||||
if (Tag->isBeingDefined()) {
|
||||
if (RecordDecl *RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(Tag))
|
||||
RD->completeDefinition();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We're undoing ActOnTagStartDefinition here, not
|
||||
// ActOnStartCXXMemberDeclarations, so we don't have to mess with
|
||||
// the FieldCollector.
|
||||
@@ -8840,11 +8856,19 @@ FieldDecl *Sema::CheckFieldDecl(DeclarationName Name, QualType T,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
QualType EltTy = Context.getBaseElementType(T);
|
||||
if (!EltTy->isDependentType() &&
|
||||
RequireCompleteType(Loc, EltTy, diag::err_field_incomplete)) {
|
||||
// Fields of incomplete type force their record to be invalid.
|
||||
Record->setInvalidDecl();
|
||||
InvalidDecl = true;
|
||||
if (!EltTy->isDependentType()) {
|
||||
if (RequireCompleteType(Loc, EltTy, diag::err_field_incomplete)) {
|
||||
// Fields of incomplete type force their record to be invalid.
|
||||
Record->setInvalidDecl();
|
||||
InvalidDecl = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
NamedDecl *Def;
|
||||
EltTy->isIncompleteType(&Def);
|
||||
if (Def && Def->isInvalidDecl()) {
|
||||
Record->setInvalidDecl();
|
||||
InvalidDecl = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// C99 6.7.2.1p8: A member of a structure or union may have any type other
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -527,10 +527,6 @@ static bool LookupBuiltin(Sema &S, LookupResult &R) {
|
||||
/// the class at this point.
|
||||
static bool CanDeclareSpecialMemberFunction(ASTContext &Context,
|
||||
const CXXRecordDecl *Class) {
|
||||
// Don't do it if the class is invalid.
|
||||
if (Class->isInvalidDecl())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// We need to have a definition for the class.
|
||||
if (!Class->getDefinition() || Class->isDependentContext())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,18 @@
|
||||
void erroneous(int);
|
||||
void erroneous(float);
|
||||
|
||||
struct bar;
|
||||
struct zed {
|
||||
bar g;
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct baz {
|
||||
zed h;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct S {
|
||||
{
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
||||
void foo(void) {
|
||||
@@ -17,8 +29,8 @@ void foo(void) {
|
||||
// RUN: c-index-test -test-load-source local %s -include %t.h -Xclang -detailed-preprocessing-record | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PARSE %s
|
||||
// RUN: c-index-test -index-file %s -include %t.h -Xclang -detailed-preprocessing-record | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-INDEX %s
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:10:6: FunctionDecl=foo:10:6 (Definition) Extent=[10:1 - 12:2]
|
||||
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:11:3: CallExpr=erroneous:5:6 Extent=[11:3 - 11:15]
|
||||
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:{{.*}}:6: FunctionDecl=foo
|
||||
// CHECK-PARSE: pch-with-errors.c:{{.*}}:3: CallExpr=erroneous
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK-INDEX: [indexDeclaration]: kind: function | name: foo
|
||||
// CHECK-INDEX: [indexEntityReference]: kind: function | name: erroneous
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ struct basic_string{
|
||||
basic_string(aT*);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct runtime_error{ // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
|
||||
runtime_error( // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
|
||||
struct runtime_error{
|
||||
runtime_error(
|
||||
basic_string<char> struct{ // expected-error {{cannot combine with previous 'type-name' declaration specifier}}
|
||||
a(){ // expected-error {{requires a type specifier}}
|
||||
runtime_error(0); // expected-error {{no matching conversion}}
|
||||
runtime_error(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user