Implement a warning for mixing bitwise logical with comparison ops. Fixes PR5297.

llvm-svn: 85117
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Redl
2009-10-26 15:24:15 +00:00
parent b3549d74da
commit 4302824fe2
3 changed files with 73 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -1385,6 +1385,10 @@ def warn_shift_negative : Warning<
def warn_shift_gt_typewidth : Warning<
"shift count >= width of type">;
def warn_precedence_bitwise_rel : Warning<
"%0 has lower precedence than %1; %1 will be evaluated first">,
InGroup<Parentheses>;
def err_sizeof_nonfragile_interface : Error<
"invalid application of '%select{alignof|sizeof}1' to interface %0 in "
"non-fragile ABI">;

View File

@@ -5412,6 +5412,53 @@ Action::OwningExprResult Sema::CreateBuiltinBinOp(SourceLocation OpLoc,
OpLoc));
}
static inline bool IsBitwise(int Opc) {
return Opc >= BinaryOperator::And && Opc <= BinaryOperator::Or;
}
static inline bool IsEqOrRel(int Opc) {
return Opc >= BinaryOperator::LT && Opc <= BinaryOperator::NE;
}
static void DiagnoseBitwisePrecedence(Sema &Self, BinaryOperator::Opcode Opc,
SourceLocation OpLoc,Expr *lhs,Expr *rhs){
typedef BinaryOperator::Opcode Opcode;
int lhsopc = -1, rhsopc = -1;
if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(lhs))
lhsopc = BO->getOpcode();
if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(rhs))
rhsopc = BO->getOpcode();
// Subs are not binary operators.
if (lhsopc == -1 && rhsopc == -1)
return;
// Bitwise operations are sometimes used as eager logical ops.
// Don't diagnose this.
if ((IsEqOrRel(lhsopc) || IsBitwise(lhsopc)) &&
(IsEqOrRel(rhsopc) || IsBitwise(rhsopc)))
return;
if (IsEqOrRel(lhsopc))
Self.Diag(OpLoc, diag::warn_precedence_bitwise_rel)
<< SourceRange(lhs->getLocStart(), OpLoc)
<< BinaryOperator::getOpcodeStr(Opc)
<< BinaryOperator::getOpcodeStr(static_cast<Opcode>(lhsopc));
else if (IsEqOrRel(rhsopc))
Self.Diag(OpLoc, diag::warn_precedence_bitwise_rel)
<< SourceRange(OpLoc, rhs->getLocEnd())
<< BinaryOperator::getOpcodeStr(Opc)
<< BinaryOperator::getOpcodeStr(static_cast<Opcode>(rhsopc));
}
/// DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence - Emit warnings for expressions with tricky
/// precedence. This currently diagnoses only "arg1 'bitwise' arg2 'eq' arg3".
/// But it could also warn about arg1 && arg2 || arg3, as GCC 4.3+ does.
static void DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence(Sema &Self, BinaryOperator::Opcode Opc,
SourceLocation OpLoc, Expr *lhs, Expr *rhs){
if (IsBitwise(Opc))
DiagnoseBitwisePrecedence(Self, Opc, OpLoc, lhs, rhs);
}
// Binary Operators. 'Tok' is the token for the operator.
Action::OwningExprResult Sema::ActOnBinOp(Scope *S, SourceLocation TokLoc,
tok::TokenKind Kind,
@@ -5422,6 +5469,9 @@ Action::OwningExprResult Sema::ActOnBinOp(Scope *S, SourceLocation TokLoc,
assert((lhs != 0) && "ActOnBinOp(): missing left expression");
assert((rhs != 0) && "ActOnBinOp(): missing right expression");
// Emit warnings for tricky precedence issues, e.g. "bitfield & 0x4 == 0"
DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence(*this, Opc, TokLoc, lhs, rhs);
if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus &&
(lhs->getType()->isOverloadableType() ||
rhs->getType()->isOverloadableType())) {

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
// RUN: clang-cc -Wparentheses -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// Test the various warnings under -Wparentheses
void if_assign(void) {
int i;
if (i = 4) {} // expected-warning {{assignment as a condition}}
if ((i = 4)) {}
}
void bitwise_rel(unsigned i) {
(void)(i & 0x2 == 0); // expected-warning {{& has lower precedence than ==}}
(void)(0 == i & 0x2); // expected-warning {{& has lower precedence than ==}}
(void)(i & 0xff < 30); // expected-warning {{& has lower precedence than <}}
(void)((i & 0x2) == 0);
(void)(i & (0x2 == 0));
// Eager logical op
(void)(i == 1 | i == 2 | i == 3);
(void)(i != 1 & i != 2 & i != 3);
}