[clang-format] Fix parsing of msg{field}-style proto options

Summary:
This patch makes the `{` in `msg_field{field: OK}` in a proto option scope be
treated as an assignment operator. Previosly the added test case was formatted
as:
```
option (MyProto.options) = {
  field_a: OK
  field_b{field_c: OK} field_d: OKOKOK field_e: OK
}
```

Reviewers: djasper

Reviewed By: djasper

Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34749

llvm-svn: 306672
This commit is contained in:
Krasimir Georgiev
2017-06-29 13:30:41 +00:00
parent fe09f506b6
commit feeba61006
2 changed files with 17 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -1570,8 +1570,10 @@ private:
const FormatToken *NextNonComment = Current->getNextNonComment();
if (Current->is(TT_ConditionalExpr))
return prec::Conditional;
if (NextNonComment && NextNonComment->is(tok::colon) &&
NextNonComment->is(TT_DictLiteral))
if (NextNonComment && Current->is(TT_SelectorName) &&
(NextNonComment->is(TT_DictLiteral) ||
(Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_Proto &&
NextNonComment->is(tok::less))))
return prec::Assignment;
if (Current->is(TT_JsComputedPropertyName))
return prec::Assignment;

View File

@@ -201,6 +201,12 @@ TEST_F(FormatTestProto, FormatsOptions) {
" field_c: \"OK\"\n"
" msg_field{field_d: 123}\n"
"};");
verifyFormat("option (MyProto.options) = {\n"
" field_a: OK\n"
" field_b{field_c: OK}\n"
" field_d: OKOKOK\n"
" field_e: OK\n"
"}");
// Support syntax with <> instead of {}.
verifyFormat("option (MyProto.options) = {\n"
@@ -208,6 +214,13 @@ TEST_F(FormatTestProto, FormatsOptions) {
" msg_field: <field_d: 123>\n"
"};");
verifyFormat("option (MyProto.options) = {\n"
" field_a: OK\n"
" field_b<field_c: OK>\n"
" field_d: OKOKOK\n"
" field_e: OK\n"
"}");
verifyFormat("option (MyProto.options) = {\n"
" msg_field: <>\n"
" field_c: \"OK\",\n"