This patch makes it easier to support running the lit tests for new and
unusual platforms. It will break existing users that set
LIBCXX_TARGET_INFO to anything other than the default. I think this is
fine, because the old LIBCXX_TARGET_INFO wasn't terribly useful.
The old way of supporting the different test platforms was to have
conditional code scattered throughout config.py. New platforms would need
to add conditionals there. Alternatively, the new platform could set
no_default_flags to true, and reconstitue almost the entire compile and
link line, including things that don't vary across platforms.
The new way of supporting new platforms is to create a new target info
class, and have make_target_info return an instance of it. For platforms
supported in-tree, that will be done by modifying make_target_info. For
out-of-tree platforms, users can set LIBCXX_TARGET_INFO at cmake configure
time.
The target info sub-classes can provide fine-grained information back to
config.py. The hooks that will most commonly be provided will be
add_cxx_compile_flags and add_cxx_link_flags. These hooks can provide the
platform specific flags, while letting config.py handle all the invariant
flags.
Target info hooks were added for each area that the existing config.py had
platform specific behavior. config.py is now mostly free of platform
specific conditionals.
This patch was tested on Linux x86_64. I both targeted Linux x86_64, and
an out-of-tree platform with a custom target_info. In both cases I was
able to run libcxx and libcxxabi tests. I do not have access to FreeBSD,
Darwin, or Windows machines that are set up for lit testing.
llvm-svn: 256588
Also remove now-redundant explicit alignment specification on some of
the classes converted prior to TrailingObjects automatically ensuring
proper alignment.
llvm-svn: 256585
MSVC doesn't implement a mangling for C99's _Complex so we must invent
our own.
For now, treating it like a class type called _Complex in the __clang
namespace.
This means that 'void f(__Complex int))'
will demangle as: 'void f(struct __clang::_Complex<int>)'
llvm-svn: 256583
If running the PlaceSafepoints pass on a module which doesn't have the
gc.safepoint_poll function without disabling entry and backedge safepoints,
previously the pass crashed with an obscure error because of a null pointer.
Now it fails the assert instead.
llvm-svn: 256580
underlying decls. Preserve the found declaration throughout, and only map to
the underlying declaration when we want to check whether it's the right kind.
This allows us to provide the right source location for the found declaration,
and prepares for the possibility of underlying decls with a different name
from the found decl.
llvm-svn: 256575
So, also:
- Moved the TemplateArgumentLoc array out of the
ASTTemplateKWAndArgsInfo class (making it a simple fixed-size object),
to avoid needing to have a variable-length object as part of a
variable-length object. Now the objects that have a
ASTTemplateKWAndArgsInfo also have some TemplateArgumentLoc objects
appended directly.
- Removed some internal-use accessors which became simply a wrapper on
getTrailingObjects.
- Moved MemberNameQualifier out of the MemberExpr class, renamed it
MemberExprNameQualifier, because the template can't
refer to a class nested within the class it's defining.
llvm-svn: 256570
The code that was meant to adjust the duplication cost based on the
terminator opcode was not being executed in cases where the initial
threshold was hit inside the loop.
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15536
llvm-svn: 256568
The nullability checker currently allows casts to suppress warnings when a nil
literal is passed as an argument to a parameter annotated as _Nonnull:
foo((NSString * _Nonnull)nil); // no-warning
It does so by suppressing the diagnostic when the *type* of the argument expression
is _Nonnull -- even when the symbolic value returned is known to be nil.
This commit updates the nullability checker to similarly honor such casts in the analogous
scenario when nil is returned from a function with a _Nonnull return type:
return (NSString * _Nonnull)nil; // no-warning
This commit also normalizes variable naming between the parameter and return cases and
adds several tests demonstrating the limitations of this suppression mechanism (such as
when nil is cast to _Nonnull and then stored into a local variable without a nullability
qualifier). These tests are marked with FIXMEs.
rdar://problem/23176782
llvm-svn: 256567
member function exists on a class.
The previous trick depended on inheriting from the class it was
checking, which will fail when I start marking things 'final'.
Attempt #2: now with a special #ifdef branch for MSVC.
Hopefully *this* actually builds with all supported compilers...
llvm-svn: 256564
MSVC doesn't implement a mangling for C11's _Atomic so we must invent
our own.
For now, treating it like a class type called _Atomic in the __clang
namespace.
This means that 'void f(__Atomic(int))'
will demangle as: 'void f(struct __clang::_Atomic<int>)'
llvm-svn: 256557
We used to produce a type which demangled to:
union __clang_vec8_F
That 'F' is the mangling for 'short' but it is present in the mangled
name in an inappropriate place, leading to it not getting demangled.
Instead, create a synthetic class type in a synthetic namespace called
__clang. With this, it now demangles to:
union __clang::__vector<short,8>
llvm-svn: 256556
This is necessary to use them as part of pointer traits and is generally
useful. I've added unit test coverage to isolate and ensure this works
correctly.
I'll watch the build bots to try to see if any compilers can't tolerate
this bit of magic (and much credit goes to Richard Smith for coming up
with this magical production!) but give a shout if you see issues.
llvm-svn: 256553
of casting the integer '4' to such a pointer. There is no reason to
expect '4' to be a portable or reliable pointer of this form. The only
reason this ever worked is because the PointerIntPair that this actually
gets used with has an artificially *low* presumed alignment that allowed
it to work. When the alignment of PointerIntPair is derived from the
actual type's alignment, the asserts start firing on this pointer. I'm
amazed we never managed to do anything that triggered the alignment
sanitizer with it, as this is just flat out UB.
If folks dislike this approach to providing a sentinel fragment address,
there are a myriad of other alternatives, suggestions welcome. But this
one has the distinct advantage of not requiring the friend dance of
ilist's sentinel (which I'll point out is *also* in play for
MCFragment!) and seems to be using a nicely provided facility in
MCFragment to establish just such dummy nodes.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256552
inline definitions after the mutually recursive pair of types have been
defined. The two types mutually recurse specifically through
abstractions that require pointer traits which makes this kind of mutual
recursion especially tricky to get right in terms of ordering.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256551
