Since these timeouts guard against catastrophic error in debugserver,
I also increased all of them to the maximum value among them.
The motivation for this test was the observation that an asanified
LLDB would often exhibit seemingly random test failures that could be
traced back to debugserver packets getting out of sync. With this path
applied I can no longer reproduce the one particular failure mode that
I was investigating.
rdar://problem/49441261
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60340
llvm-svn: 357829
I found the code of Process::WriteMemory particularly hard to follow
when reviewing Ismail's change in D60022. This simplifies the code and
hopefully prevents similar oversights in the future.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60092
llvm-svn: 357428
Summary:
In case of a breakpoint site overlapping with the destination address,
the WriteMemory method reported an incorrect memory size.
Instead of returning the right amount of bytes written, it falls through
the scope and returned 0.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, friss, jingham
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, davide, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60022
llvm-svn: 357420
For = operators for lists that have mutexes, we were either
just taking the locks sequentially or hand-rolling a trick
to try to avoid lock inversion. Use the std::lock mechanism
for this instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59957
llvm-svn: 357276
For a single char argument, find_first_of is equal to find and
find_last_of is equal to rfind. While playing around with the plugin
stuff this caused an export failure because it always got inlined except
once, which resulted in an undefined symbol.
llvm-svn: 357198
Summary:
This patch is the MVP version of importing the std module into the expression parser to improve C++ debugging.
What happens in this patch is that we inject a `@import std` into our expression source code. We also
modify our internal Clang instance for parsing this expression to work with modules and debug info
at the same time (which is the main change in terms of LOC). We implicitly build the `std` module on the first use. The
C++ include paths for building are extracted from the debug info, which means that this currently only
works if the program is compiled with `-glldb -fmodules` and uses the std module. The C include paths
are currently specified by LLDB.
I enabled the tests currently only for libc++ and Linux because I could test this locally. I'll enable the tests
for other platforms once this has landed and doesn't break any bots (and I implemented the platform-specific
C include paths for them).
With this patch we can now:
* Build a libc++ as a module and import it into the expression parser.
* Read from the module while also referencing declarations from the debug info. E.g. `std::abs(local_variable)`.
What doesn't work (yet):
* Merging debug info and C++ module declarations. E.g. `std::vector<CustomClass>` doesn't work.
* Pretty much anything that involves the ASTImporter and templated code. As the ASTImporter is used for saving the result declaration, this means that we can't
call yet any function that returns a non-trivial type.
* Use libstdc++ for this, as it requires multiple include paths and Clang only emits one include path per module. Also libstdc++ doesn't support Clang modules without patches.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham, shafik, friss, davide, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58125
llvm-svn: 355939
There was a crash that would happen if an IDE would ask for a child of a shared pointer via any SB API call that ends up calling StackFrame::GetValueForVariableExpressionPath(). The previous code expects an error to be set describing why the synthetic child of a type was not able to be found, but we have some synthetic child providers that weren't setting the error and returning an empty value object shared pointer. This fixes that to ensure we don't lose our debug session by crashing, fully tests GetValueForVariableExpressionPath functionality, and ensures we don't crash on GetValueForVariableExpressionPath() in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59200
llvm-svn: 355850
to do "databuffer + offset" so that we don't overflow the uint64_t's
we're using for addresses when working with high addresses.
Found with clang's ubsan while doing darwin kernel debugging.
<rdar://problem/48728940>
llvm-svn: 355761
Previously if an invalid program was specified, there was a bug
which, when we attempted to launch the program, would report that
the operation succeeded, causing LLDB to then hang while waiting
indefinitely to receive some events from the process.
After this patch, when an invalid program is specified, we immediately
return to vs code with an error message that indicates that the
program can not be found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59114
llvm-svn: 355656
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
This was reverted because it breaks the GreenDragon bot, but
the reason for the breakage is lost, so I'm resubmitting this
now so we can find out what the problem is.
llvm-svn: 355528
Summary:
This file implements some general purpose data structures, and so it
belongs to the Utility module.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, JDevlieghere, clayborg, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, javed.absar, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58970
llvm-svn: 355509
There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.
To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.
After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842
llvm-svn: 355342
Summary:
This creates an abstract base class called "UserIDResolver", which can
be implemented to provide user/group ID resolution capabilities for
various objects. Posix host implement a PosixUserIDResolver, which does
that using posix apis (getpwuid and friends). PlatformGDBRemote
forwards queries over the gdb-remote link, etc. ProcessInstanceInfo
class is refactored to make use of this interface instead of taking a
platform pointer as an argument. The base resolver class already
implements caching and thread-safety, so implementations don't have to
worry about that.
The main motivating factor for this was to remove external dependencies
from the ProcessInstanceInfo class (so it can be put next to
ProcessLaunchInfo and friends), but it has other benefits too:
- ability to test the user name caching code
- ability to test ProcessInstanceInfo dumping code
- consistent interface for user/group resolution between Platform and
Host classes.
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58167
llvm-svn: 355323
When the debugger is run in sync mode, you need to
be able to tell whether a hijacked resume is for some
special purpose (like waiting for the SIGSTOP on attach)
or just to perform a synchronous resume. Target::Launch was doing
that wrong, and that caused stop-hooks on process launch
in source files to behave incorrectly.
<rdar://problem/48115661>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58727
llvm-svn: 355213
They aren't designed to nest recursively, so this will prevent that.
Also add a --auto-continue flag, putting "continue" in the stop hook makes
the stop hooks fight one another in multi-threaded programs.
Also allow more than one -o options so you can make more complex stop hooks w/o
having to go into the editor.
<rdar://problem/48115661>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58394
llvm-svn: 354706
Host had a function to get the UnixSignals instance corresponding
to the current host architecture. This means that Host had to
include a file from Target. To break this dependency, just make
this a static function directly in UnixSignals. We already have
the function UnixSignals::Create(ArchSpec) anyway, so we just
need to have UnixSignals::CreateForHost() which determines which
value to pass for the ArchSpec.
The goal here is to eventually break the Host->Target->Host
circular dependency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57780
llvm-svn: 354168
Summary:
Implement a few routines for Windows to support some basic process interaction and file system operations.
Reviewers: zturner, llvm-commits, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: emaste, jdoerfert, Hui, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56232
llvm-svn: 354010
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Summary:
The two classes contained a lot of duplicated code, but there wasn't a
good place to factor it to. It couldn't be the base Platform class,
since we also have platforms which are only remote (such as
PlatformGDBRemoteServer), and so it did not make sense for those to have
an m_remote_platform member.
This patch creates a new class, RemoteAwarePlatform, which can serve as
a base class for platforms which can both serve as a host, and forward
actions to a remote system. It is motivated partly by D56232 (which was
about to add a bunch of additional duplicated methods), and partly by my
own need to modify a function which happens to be implemented in both
places identically.
The patch moves the methods which are trivially identical in the two
classes into the common base class, there were one or two more methods
which could probably be merged into one, but this wasn't completely
trivial, so I did not attempt to do that now.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, clayborg, asmith
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, Hui, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58052
llvm-svn: 353812
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
An equivalent change was made to RemapPaths, but it needed to be made
here as well. Also added a test for this and made the setup a little
more complex to avoid false successes.
<rdar://problem/47642498>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57552
llvm-svn: 353243
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This parameter was only ever used with the Module set, and
since a SymbolFile is tied to a module, the parameter turns
out to be entirely unnecessary. Furthermore, it doesn't make
a lot of sense to ask a caller to ask SymbolFile which is tied
to Module X to find types for Module Y, but that possibility
was open with the previous interface. By removing this
parameter from the API, it makes it harder to use incorrectly
as well as easier for an implementor to understand what it
needs to do.
llvm-svn: 351133
LLVM added wrappers to std::sort (r327219) that randomly shuffle the
container before sorting. The goal is to uncover non-determinism due to
undefined sorting order of objects having the same key.
This can be enabled with -DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=ON.
llvm-svn: 350679
Summary:
The target was being used in FinalizeFileActions to provide default
values for stdin/out/err. Also, most of the logic of this function was
very specific to how the lldb's Target class wants to launch processes,
so I, move it to Target::FinalizeFileActions, inverting the dependency.
The only piece of logic that was useful elsewhere (lldb-server) was the
part which sets up a pty and relevant file actions. I've kept this part
as ProcessLaunchInfo::SetUpPtyRedirection.
This makes ProcessLaunchInfo independent of any high-level lldb constructs.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56196
llvm-svn: 350617
Summary:
The Debuffer object was being used in "GetListenerForProcess" to provide
a default listener object if one was not specified in the launch_info
object.
Since all the callers of this function immediately passed the result to
Target::CreateProcess, it was easy to move this logic there instead.
This brings us one step closer towards being able to move the LaunchInfo
classes to the Host layer (which is there the launching code that
consumes them lives).
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56174
llvm-svn: 350510
There is already in use:
lit/lit-lldb-init:
settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py:
self.runCmd('settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false')
But those are not in effect during MI part of the testsuite. Another problem is
that symbols.enable-external-lookup (read by GetEnableExternalLookup) has been
currently read only by LocateMacOSXFilesUsingDebugSymbols and therefore it had
no effect on Linux.
On Red Hat platforms (Fedoras, RHEL-7) there is DWZ in use and so
MiSyntaxTestCase-test_lldbmi_output_grammar FAILs due to:
AssertionError: error: inconsistent pattern ''^.+?\n'' for state 0x5f
(matched string: warning: (x86_64) /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 unsupported
DW_FORM values: 0x1f20 0x1f21
It is the only testcase with this error. It happens due to:
(lldb) target create "/lib64/libstdc++.so.6"
Current executable set to '/lib64/libstdc++.so.6' (x86_64).
(lldb) b main
warning: (x86_64) /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 unsupported DW_FORM values: 0x1f20 0x1f21
Breakpoint 1: no locations (pending).
WARNING: Unable to resolve breakpoint to any actual locations.
which happens only with gcc-base-debuginfo rpm installed (similarly for other packages).
It should also speed up the testsuite as it no longer needs to read
/usr/lib/debug symbols which have no effect (and should not have any effect) on
the testsuite results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55859
llvm-svn: 350368
This builds on https://reviews.llvm.org/D43884 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D43886 and extends LLDB support of Obj-C exceptions to also look for a "current exception" for a thread in the C++ exception handling runtime metadata (via call to __cxa_current_exception_type). We also construct an actual historical SBThread/ThreadSP that contains frames from the backtrace in the Obj-C exception object.
The high level goal this achieves is that when we're already crashed (because an unhandled exception occurred), we can still access the exception object and retrieve the backtrace from the throw point. In Obj-C, this is particularly useful because a catch+rethrow is very common and in those cases you currently don't have any access to the throw point backtrace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44072
llvm-svn: 349718
We need to ensure that Finalize gets called before we start
to destroy the old Process or the weak_ptr->shared_ptr link
from Threads to Target gets broken before the threads are
destroyed.
<rdar://problem/43586979>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55631
llvm-svn: 349435
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
Summary:
These are general purpose "utility" classes, whose functionality is not
debugger-specific in any way. As such, I believe they belong in the
Utility module.
This doesn't break any particular dependency (yet), but it reduces the
number of Core dependencies across the board.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55361
llvm-svn: 349157
