`bug49334.cpp` directly uses `!=` to compare two floating point values,
which is almost wrong.
Reviewed By: jhuber6
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119485
Currently we have a hard team limit, which is set to 65536. It says no matter whether the device can support more teams, or users set more teams, as long as it is larger than that hard limit, the final number to launch the kernel will always be that hard limit. It is way less than the actual hardware limit. For example, my workstation has GTX2080, and the hardware limit of grid size is 2147483647, which is exactly the largest number a `int32_t` can represent. There is no limitation mentioned in the spec. This patch simply removes it.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119313
Lambda names aren't entirely canonical (as demonstrated by the
cross-project-test added here) at the moment (we should fix that for a
bunch of reasons) - even if the template referencing them is
non-simplified, other names referencing /that/ template can't be
simplified either because type units might cause a different template to
be picked up that would conflict with the expected name.
(other than for roundtripping precision, it'd be OK to simplify types
that reference types that reference lambdas - but best be consistent
between the roundtrip/verify mode and the actual simplified template
names mode)
Use same MSSA clobbering checks as in the AMDGPUAnnotateUniformValues.
Kernel argument promotion needs exactly the same information so factor
out utility function isClobberedInFunction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119480
This change adds support for dsymutil to be able to dump out the new swift5 reflection sections called swift5_proto and swift5_protos. The test is also updated to check for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119310
The test sometimes fails on Windows due to a warning emitted by bash about not
being able to find the /tmp directory causing this test to randomly fail. This
update makes the test more flexible to account for this possibility and should
hopefully make it more reliable.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118691
Minor efficiency fix. There is no reason to perform the same set lookup
repeatedly in the inner loop as it is invariant there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119474
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the seventh batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
These functions allow for defining pattern fragments usable within the `match` and `rewrite` sections of a pattern. The main structure of Constraints and Rewrites functions are the same, and are similar to functions in other languages; they contain a signature (i.e. name, argument list, result list) and a body:
```pdll
// Constraint that takes a value as an input, and produces a value:
Constraint Cst(arg: Value) -> Value { ... }
// Constraint that returns multiple values:
Constraint Cst() -> (result1: Value, result2: ValueRange);
```
When returning multiple results, each result can be optionally be named (the result of a Constraint/Rewrite in the case of multiple results is a tuple).
These body of a Constraint/Rewrite functions can be specified in several ways:
* Externally
In this case we are importing an external function (registered by the user outside of PDLL):
```pdll
Constraint Foo(op: Op);
Rewrite Bar();
```
* In PDLL (using PDLL constructs)
In this case, the body is defined using PDLL constructs:
```pdll
Rewrite BuildFooOp() {
// The result type of the Rewrite is inferred from the return.
return op<my_dialect.foo>;
}
// Constraints/Rewrites can also implement a lambda/expression
// body for simple one line bodies.
Rewrite BuildFooOp() => op<my_dialect.foo>;
```
* In PDLL (using a native/C++ code block)
In this case the body is specified using a C++(or potentially other language at some point) code block. When building PDLL in AOT mode this will generate a native constraint/rewrite and register it with the PDL bytecode.
```pdll
Rewrite BuildFooOp() -> Op<my_dialect.foo> [{
return rewriter.create<my_dialect::FooOp>(...);
}];
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115836
This allows for defining simple patterns in a single line. The lambda
body of a Pattern expects a single operation rewrite statement:
```
Pattern => replace op<my_dialect.foo>(operands: ValueRange) with operands;
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115835
Most notably,
llvm/Object/Binary.h no longer includes llvm/Support/MemoryBuffer.h
llvm/Object/MachOUniversal*.h no longer include llvm/Object/Archive.h
llvm/Object/TapiUniversal.h no longer includes llvm/Object/TapiFile.h
llvm-project preprocessed size:
before: 1068185081
after: 1068324320
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119457
We are moving away from building the runtimes with LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS,
however the documentation was largely outdated. This commit updates all
the documentation I could find to use LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES instead of
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS for building runtimes.
Note that in the near future, libcxx, libcxxabi and libunwind will stop
supporting being built with LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS altogether. I don't know
what the plans are for other runtimes like libc, openmp and compiler-rt,
so I didn't make any changes to the documentation that would imply
something for those projects.
Once this lands, I will also cherry-pick this on the release/14.x branch
to make sure that LLVM's documentation is up-to-date and reflects what
we intend to support in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119351
Summary:
This is neccessary to support solaris/sparc9 where some userspace
addresses have all top bits set, as well as, potentially, kernel memory
on aarch64.
This change does not update the compiler side (HWASan IR pass) which
needs to be done separately for the affected targets.
Reviewers: ro, vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91827
New users might want to check bins without a load or store instruction
at hand. Since we use those instructions only to find the offset and
size of the access anyway, we can expose an offset and size interface
to the outside world as well.
This commit mainly moves code around and exposes a class (OffsetAndSize)
as well as a method forallInterferingAccesses in AAPointerInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119249
The oversight caused us to ignore call sites that are effectively dead
when we computed reachability (or more precise the call edges of a
function). The problem is that loads in the readonly callee might depend
on stores prior to the callee. If we do not track the call edge we
mistakenly assumed the store before the call cannot reach the load.
The problem is nicely visible in:
`llvm/test/Transforms/Attributor/ArgumentPromotion/basictest.ll`
Caused by D118673.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53726
