Jim Ingham 10ebffa48a Don't expose the pthread_mutex_t underlying the Mutex & Mutex::Locker classes.
No one was using it and Locker(pthread_mutex_t *) immediately asserts for 
pthread_mutex_t's that don't come from a Mutex anyway.  Rather than try to make
that work, we should maintain the Mutex abstraction and not pass around the
platform implementation...

Make Mutex::Locker::Lock take a Mutex & or a Mutex *, and remove the constructor
taking a pthread_mutex_t *.  You no longer need to call Mutex::GetMutex to pass
your mutex to a Locker (you can't in fact, since I made it private.)

llvm-svn: 156221
2012-05-04 23:02:50 +00:00
2012-02-22 04:47:39 +00:00
2012-05-04 01:14:02 +00:00
2012-05-04 21:36:08 +00:00
Description
No description provided
5.1 GiB
Languages
LLVM 41.5%
C++ 31.7%
C 13%
Assembly 9.1%
MLIR 1.5%
Other 2.8%