Currently we do not consider incoming values of PHIs as roots for SLP
vectorization. This means we miss scenarios like the one in the test
case and PR47670.
It appears quite straight-forward to consider incoming values of PHIs as
roots for vectorization, but I might be missing something that makes
this problematic.
In terms of vectorized instructions, this applies to quite a few
benchmarks across MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86 with -O3 -flto
Same hash: 185 (filtered out)
Remaining: 52
Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions
Program base patch diff
test-suite...ProxyApps-C++/HPCCG/HPCCG.test 9.00 27.00 200.0%
test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test 8.00 22.00 175.0%
test-suite...T2006/458.sjeng/458.sjeng.test 14.00 30.00 114.3%
test-suite...ce/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p.test 11.00 18.00 63.6%
test-suite...s/FreeBench/neural/neural.test 12.00 18.00 50.0%
test-suite...rimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des.test 65.00 95.00 46.2%
test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test 63.00 89.00 41.3%
test-suite...ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CLAMR.test 177.00 250.00 41.2%
test-suite...nchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp.test 13.00 18.00 38.5%
test-suite.../Applications/sgefa/sgefa.test 26.00 35.00 34.6%
test-suite...pplications/oggenc/oggenc.test 100.00 133.00 33.0%
test-suite...6/482.sphinx3/482.sphinx3.test 103.00 134.00 30.1%
test-suite...oxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test 169.00 213.00 26.0%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp.test 59.00 73.00 23.7%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 503.00 622.00 23.7%
test-suite...T2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer.test 65.00 79.00 21.5%
test-suite...libquantum/462.libquantum.test 58.00 68.00 17.2%
test-suite...ternal/HMMER/hmmcalibrate.test 84.00 98.00 16.7%
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 351.00 401.00 14.2%
test-suite...arks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test 52.00 57.00 9.6%
test-suite...ce/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh.test 118.00 128.00 8.5%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test 6355.00 6880.00 8.3%
test-suite...nsumer-lame/consumer-lame.test 480.00 519.00 8.1%
test-suite...000/183.equake/183.equake.test 226.00 244.00 8.0%
test-suite...chmarks/Olden/power/power.test 105.00 113.00 7.6%
test-suite...6/471.omnetpp/471.omnetpp.test 92.00 99.00 7.6%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 1173.00 1261.00 7.5%
test-suite...0/253.perlbmk/253.perlbmk.test 55.00 59.00 7.3%
test-suite...oxyApps-C/miniAMR/miniAMR.test 92.00 98.00 6.5%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test 446.00 473.00 6.1%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test 464.00 491.00 5.8%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 998.00 1055.00 5.7%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 5711.00 6007.00 5.2%
test-suite...FreeBench/distray/distray.test 102.00 107.00 4.9%
test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test 4184.00 4378.00 4.6%
test-suite...DOE-ProxyApps-C/CoMD/CoMD.test 112.00 117.00 4.5%
test-suite...T2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk.test 104.00 108.00 3.8%
test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test 789.00 819.00 3.8%
test-suite...yApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT.test 233.00 241.00 3.4%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 417.00 428.00 2.6%
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 627.00 643.00 2.6%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/nbench/nbench.test 259.00 265.00 2.3%
test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 4641.00 4732.00 2.0%
test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test 106.00 108.00 1.9%
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 1639.00 1664.00 1.5%
test-suite...oxyApps-C/RSBench/rsbench.test 66.00 65.00 -1.5%
test-suite.../CINT2000/252.eon/252.eon.test 3416.00 3444.00 0.8%
test-suite...CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp.test 1846.00 1861.00 0.8%
test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test 152.00 153.00 0.7%
test-suite...CFP2006/444.namd/444.namd.test 3528.00 3544.00 0.5%
test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test 98.00 98.00 0.0%
test-suite...frame_layout/frame_layout.test NaN 39.00 nan%
On ARM64, there appears to be a slight regression on SPEC2006, which
might be interesting to investigate:
test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test 0.9%
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88735
The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
This directory and its sub-directories contain source code for LLVM, a toolkit for the construction of highly optimized compilers, optimizers, and run-time environments.
The README briefly describes how to get started with building LLVM. For more information on how to contribute to the LLVM project, please take a look at the Contributing to LLVM guide.
Getting Started with the LLVM System
Taken from https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html.
Overview
Welcome to the LLVM project!
The LLVM project has multiple components. The core of the project is itself called "LLVM". This contains all of the tools, libraries, and header files needed to process intermediate representations and converts it into object files. Tools include an assembler, disassembler, bitcode analyzer, and bitcode optimizer. It also contains basic regression tests.
C-like languages use the Clang front end. This component compiles C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++ code into LLVM bitcode -- and from there into object files, using LLVM.
Other components include: the libc++ C++ standard library, the LLD linker, and more.
Getting the Source Code and Building LLVM
The LLVM Getting Started documentation may be out of date. The Clang Getting Started page might have more accurate information.
This is an example work-flow and configuration to get and build the LLVM source:
-
Checkout LLVM (including related sub-projects like Clang):
-
git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git -
Or, on windows,
git clone --config core.autocrlf=false https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
-
-
Configure and build LLVM and Clang:
-
cd llvm-project -
mkdir build -
cd build -
cmake -G <generator> [options] ../llvmSome common build system generators are:
Ninja--- for generating Ninja build files. Most llvm developers use Ninja.Unix Makefiles--- for generating make-compatible parallel makefiles.Visual Studio--- for generating Visual Studio projects and solutions.Xcode--- for generating Xcode projects.
Some Common options:
-
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='...'--- semicolon-separated list of the LLVM sub-projects you'd like to additionally build. Can include any of: clang, clang-tools-extra, libcxx, libcxxabi, libunwind, lldb, compiler-rt, lld, polly, or debuginfo-tests.For example, to build LLVM, Clang, libcxx, and libcxxabi, use
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;libcxx;libcxxabi". -
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=directory--- Specify for directory the full path name of where you want the LLVM tools and libraries to be installed (default/usr/local). -
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=type--- Valid options for type are Debug, Release, RelWithDebInfo, and MinSizeRel. Default is Debug. -
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On--- Compile with assertion checks enabled (default is Yes for Debug builds, No for all other build types).
-
cmake --build . [-- [options] <target>]or your build system specified above directly.-
The default target (i.e.
ninjaormake) will build all of LLVM. -
The
check-alltarget (i.e.ninja check-all) will run the regression tests to ensure everything is in working order. -
CMake will generate targets for each tool and library, and most LLVM sub-projects generate their own
check-<project>target. -
Running a serial build will be slow. To improve speed, try running a parallel build. That's done by default in Ninja; for
make, use the option-j NNN, whereNNNis the number of parallel jobs, e.g. the number of CPUs you have.
-
-
For more information see CMake
-
Consult the Getting Started with LLVM page for detailed information on configuring and compiling LLVM. You can visit Directory Layout to learn about the layout of the source code tree.