Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
The patch introduces MakeLibCallOptions struct as suggested by @efriedma on D65497.
The struct contain argument flags which will pass to makeLibCall function.
The patch should not has any functionality changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65795
llvm-svn: 369622
Without this patch, failing to provide a subcommand to lit's internal
`env` results in either a python `IndexError` or an attempt to execute
the final `env` argument, such as `FOO=1`, as a command. This patch
diagnoses those cases with a more helpful message.
Reviewed By: stella.stamenova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66482
llvm-svn: 369620
For `map`, the following restriction changed in OpenMP 5.0:
* OpenMP 4.5 [2.15.5.1, Restrictions]: "A list item cannot appear in
both a map clause and a data-sharing attribute clause on the same
construct.
* OpenMP 5.0 [2.19.7.1, Restrictions]: "A list item cannot appear in
both a map clause and a data-sharing attribute clause on the same
construct unless the construct is a combined construct."
This patch removes this restriction in the case of combined constructs
and OpenMP 5.0, and it updates Sema not to capture a scalar by copy in
the target region when `firstprivate` and `map` appear for that scalar
on a combined target construct.
This patch also adds a fixme to a test that now reveals that a
diagnostic about loop iteration variables is dropped in the case of
OpenMP 5.0. That bug exists regardless of this patch's changes.
Reviewed By: ABataev, jdoerfert, hfinkel, kkwli0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835
llvm-svn: 369619
Summary:
The former seems like it's not working on some platforms.
All the other uses use `llvm::`, so, let's change for consistency.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66566
llvm-svn: 369618
This patch concludes my GSoC'19 project by enabling track-conditions by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66381
llvm-svn: 369616
This adds a static assert that ensures that there's a format info entry
for every format enum value. This should prevent others from making the
same mistake I made and Jason kindly fixed in r369611. (Thanks!)
llvm-svn: 369614
As discussed on the mailing list, notes originating from the tracking of foreach
loop conditions are always meaningless.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66131
llvm-svn: 369613
enum Format entries; else we can crash in a place like
FormatManager::GetFormatAsCString(). We should add bounds checks
to prevent this more reliably, but for tonight I'm just adding this
entry to keep an address-sanitizer test run working.
llvm-svn: 369611
APIntToHexString returns wrong value ("0000000000000000ffffffffffffffff")
for integer larger than 64 bits, and thus
TargetLoweringObjectFileCOFF::getSectionForConstant returns same section name
for all numbers larger than 64 bits. This patch tries to fix it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66458
Patch by Senran Zhang
llvm-svn: 369610
Remove c++ standard library dependency for now for @phosek. They have a
complicated build system that breaks with the fuzzer target here.
Also added a todo to remedy later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66568
llvm-svn: 369606
Summary:
This patch introduces `DynamicCastInfo` similar to `DynamicTypeInfo` which
is stored in `CastSets` which are storing the dynamic cast informations of
objects based on memory regions. It could be used to store and check the
casts and prevent infeasible paths.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66325
llvm-svn: 369605
Summary:
The intention for this is to allow reading and printing symbols out from
llvm-nm. Tapi file, and Tapi universal follow a similiar format to
their respective MachO Object format.
The tests are dependent on llvm-nm processing tbd files which is why its in D66160
Reviewers: ributzka, steven_wu, lhames
Reviewed By: ributzka, lhames
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66159
llvm-svn: 369600
We had an odd combination of WriteJump applied to some memory
instructions and WriteJumpLd applied to register and immediate
instructions.
Thsi should hopefully assign them all correctly.
llvm-svn: 369599
In D65724, I do a pretty thorough explanation about how I'm solving this
problem, I think that summary nails whats happening here ;)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65725
llvm-svn: 369596
Locally the tight iterations bounds work fine but the bots seem unhappy.
Try to get green bots and some time to determine the underlying problem.
llvm-svn: 369592
Summary:
This fixes inference of gsl::Pointer on std::set::iterator with libstdc++ (the typedef for iterator
on the template is a DependentNameType - we can only put the gsl::Pointer attribute
on the underlaying record after instantiation)
inference of gsl::Pointer on std::vector::iterator with libc++ (the class was forward-declared,
we added the gsl::Pointer on the canonical decl (the forward decl), and later when the
template was instantiated, there was no attribute on the definition so it was not instantiated).
and a duplicate gsl::Pointer on some class with libstdc++ (we first added an attribute to
a incomplete instantiation, and then another was copied from the template definition
when the instantiation was completed).
We now add the attributes to all redeclarations to fix thos issues and make their usage easier.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: Szelethus, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66179
llvm-svn: 369591
Exactly what it says on the tin! Note that we're talking about interestingness
in general, hence this isn't a control-dependency-tracking specific patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65724
llvm-svn: 369589
The full GSYM patch started with: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53379
This patch add the ability to encode data using the new llvm::gsym::FileWriter class.
FileWriter is a simplified binary data writer class that doesn't require targets, target definitions, architectures, or require any other optional compile time libraries to be enabled via the build process. This class needs the ability to seek to different spots in the binary data that it produces to fix up offsets and sizes in GSYM data. It currently uses std::ostream over llvm::raw_ostream because llvm::raw_ostream doesn't support seeking which is required when encoding and decoding GSYM data.
AddressRange objects are encoded and decoded to be relative to a base address. This will be the FunctionInfo's start address if the AddressRange is directly contained in a FunctionInfo, or a base address of the containing parent AddressRange or AddressRanges. This allows address ranges to be efficiently encoded using ULEB128 encodings as we encode the offset and size of each range instead of full addresses. This also makes encoded addresses easy to relocate as we just need to relocate one base address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63828
llvm-svn: 369587
Summary:
To be able to track how many iterations we need to manifest all
information we check for we now make the maximum iteration count
explicit. The count is set tightly now and should be kept that way.
Reviewers: uenoku, sstefan1
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66554
llvm-svn: 369586
I noticed that SourceManager::translateFile has code that doesn't really make sense.
In particular, if it fails to find a FileID by comparing FileEntry * values, it tries to
look through files that have the same filename, to see if they have a matching inode to try to
find the right FileID. However, the inode comparison seem redundant, as Clang's FileManager
already deduplicates FileEntry * values by inode.
Thus the comparisons between inodes should never actually succeed, and the comparison between FileEntry * values should be sufficient here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65481
llvm-svn: 369585
We defined (on the mailing list and here on phabricator) 2 different cases where
retrieving information about a control dependency condition is very important:
* When the condition's last write happened in a different stack frame
* When the collapse point of the condition (when we can constrain it to be
true/false) didn't happen in the actual condition.
It seems like we solved this problem with the help of expression value tracking,
and have started working on better diagnostics notes about this process.
Expression value tracking is nothing more than registering a variety of visitors
to construct reports about it. Each of the registered visitors (ReturnVisitor,
FindLastStoreVisitor, NoStoreFuncVisitor, etc) have something to go by: a
MemRegion, an SVal, an ExplodedNode, etc. For this reason, better explaining a
last write is super simple, we can always just pass on some more information to
the visitor in question (as seen in D65575).
ConditionBRVisitor is a different beast, as it was built for a different
purpose. It is responsible for constructing events at, well, conditions, and is
registered only once, and isn't a part of the "expression value tracking
family". Unfortunately, it is also the visitor to tinker with for constructing
better diagnostics about the collapse point problem.
This creates a need for alternative way to communicate with ConditionBRVisitor
that a specific condition is being tracked for for the reason of being a control
dependency. Since at almost all PathDiagnosticEventPiece construction the
visitor checks interestingness, it makes sense to pair interestingness with a
reason as to why we marked an entity as such.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65723
llvm-svn: 369583
Summary:
Tapi files are YAML files that start with the !tapi tag. The only execption are
TBD v1 files, which don't have a tag. In that case we have to scan a little
further and check if the first key "archs" exists.
This is the first patch in a series of patches to add libObject support for
text-based dynamic library (.tbd) files.
This patch is practically exactly the same as D37820, that was never pushed to master,
and is needed for future commits related to reading tbd files for llvm-nm
Reviewers: ributzka, steven_wu, bollu, espindola, jfb, shafik, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: steven_wu
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #libc, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66149
llvm-svn: 369579
